Recently published articles in Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. See the current issues) for more.
EDITORIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Gene D. Sprouse
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020003
] Published Wed Oct 1, 2008
Read article
Gene D. Sprouse
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020002
] Published Mon Sep 15, 2008
Read article
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020001
] Published Tue Sep 9, 2008
Read article
ARTICLES
David T. Brookes and Eugenia Etkina
We introduce a linguistic framework through which one can interpret systematically students’ understanding of and reasoning about force and motion. Some researchers have suggested that students have robust misconceptions or alternative frameworks grounded in everyday experience. Others have pointe...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 010110
] Published Thu Jun 25, 2009
Read article
Eugenia Etkina, Anna Karelina, Sahana Murthy, and Maria Ruibal-Villasenor
The paper reports on how educational research informed and supported both the process of refinement of introductory physics laboratory instruction and student development of scientific abilities. In particular we focus on how the action research approach paradigm combined with instructional approach...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 010109
] Published Wed Jun 3, 2009
Read article
David Rosengrant, Alan Van Heuvelen, and Eugenia Etkina
Physics education literature recommends using multiple representations to help students understand concepts and solve problems. However, there is little research concerning why students use the representations and whether those who use them are more successful. This study addresses these questions u...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 010108
] Published Mon Jun 1, 2009
Read article
Gerd Kortemeyer
The two genders make different use of being allowed multiple tries to solve online homework problems: male students frequently attempt to immediately solve the problem, while female students are more likely to first interact with peers and teaching assistants before entering answers. More male than ...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 010107
] Published Tue May 26, 2009
Read article
Charles Baily and Noah D. Finkelstein
Introductory undergraduate courses in classical physics stress a perspective that can be characterized as realist; from this perspective, all physical properties of a classical system can be simultaneously specified and thus determined at all future times. Such a perspective can be problematic for i...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 010106
] Published Mon Mar 23, 2009
Read article
Ronald K Thornton, Dennis Kuhl, Karen Cummings, and Jeffrey Marx
In this paper we compare and contrast student’s pretest/post-test performance on the Halloun-Hestenes force concept inventory (FCI) to the Thornton-Sokoloff force and motion conceptual evaluation (FMCE). Both tests are multiple-choice assessment instruments whose results are used to characterize h...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 010105
] Published Fri Mar 20, 2009
Read article
Jill A. Marshall, Eric A. Hagedorn, and Jerry O’Connor
We report the results of an analysis of the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) designed to determine whether the TAKS is a valid indicator of whether students know and can do physics at the level necessary for success in future coursework, STEM careers, and life in a technological socie...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 010104
] Published Wed Mar 4, 2009
Read article
Elizabeth Gire, Barbara Jones, and Edward Price
Students in introductory physics courses are likely to have views about physics that differ from those of experts. However, students who continue to study physics eventually become experts themselves. Presumably these students either possess or develop more expertlike views. To investigate this proc...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 010103
] Published Mon Feb 23, 2009
Read article
Christine Lindstrøm and Manjula D. Sharma
With student numbers decreasing and traditional teaching methods having been found inefficient, it is widely accepted that alternative teaching methods need to be explored in tertiary physics education. In 2006 a different teaching environment was offered to 244 first year students with little or no...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 010102
] Published Thu Jan 22, 2009
Read article
Lauren E. Kost, Steven J. Pollock, and Noah D. Finkelstein
Previous research [S. J. Pollock , Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 1 (2007)] showed that despite the use of interactive engagement techniques, the gap in performance between males and females on a conceptual learning survey persisted from pretest to post-test at the University of Colorado at Bould...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 010101
] Published Thu Jan 8, 2009
Read article
Eugenia Etkina, Anna Karelina, and Maria Ruibal-Villasenor
Most of the time, instructors of introductory physics limit their goals to students’ acquisition of basic concepts and end-of-the-chapter problem solving efficiency. They overlook the development of students’ science process abilities required for constructing scientific knowledge and approachin...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020108
] Published Wed Dec 3, 2008
Read article
Kathy L. Malone
The modeling instruction pedagogy for the teaching of physics has been proven to be quite effective at increasing the conceptual understanding and problem-solving abilities of students to a much greater extent than that of nonmodeling students. Little research has been conducted concerning the cogni...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020107
] Published Thu Nov 20, 2008
Read article
Kara E. Gray, Wendy K. Adams, Carl E. Wieman, and Katherine K. Perkins
We measured what students perceive physicists to believe about physics and solving physics problems and how those perceptions differ from the students’ personal beliefs. In this study, we used a modified version of the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey which asked students to respon...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020106
] Published Fri Nov 14, 2008
Read article
Eleanor C. Sayre and Michael C. Wittmann
We investigate the interplay between mathematics and physics resources in intermediate mechanics students. In the mechanics course, the selection and application of coordinate systems is a consistent thread. At the University of Maine, students often start the course with a strong preference to use ...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020105
] Published Wed Nov 12, 2008
Read article
Valerie K. Otero and Kara E. Gray
Instructional techniques based on research in cognitive science and physics education have been used in physics courses to enhance student learning. While dramatic increases in conceptual understanding have been observed, students enrolled in these courses tend to move away from scientistlike views ...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020104
] Published Thu Oct 16, 2008
Read article
S. B. McKagan, K. K. Perkins, and C. E. Wieman
We report on a large-scale study of student learning of quantum tunneling in four traditional and four transformed modern physics courses. In the transformed courses, which were designed to address student difficulties found in previous research, students still struggle with many of the same issues ...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020103
] Published Wed Oct 8, 2008
Read article
Brian W. Frank, Stephen E. Kanim, and Luanna S. Gomez
We describe the results of an experiment conducted to test predictions about student responses to questions about motion based on an explicit model of student thinking in terms of the cuing of a variety of different physical intuitions or conceptual resources. This particular model allows us to acco...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020102
] Published Tue Sep 23, 2008
Read article
Trevor I. Smith and Michael C. Wittmann
We suggest one redefinition of common clusters of questions used to analyze student responses on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation. Our goal is to propose a methodology that moves beyond an analysis of student learning defined by correct responses, either on the overall test or on clusters ...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 020101
] Published Wed Sep 10, 2008
Read article
Lin Ding, Neville W. Reay, Albert Lee, and Lei Bao
Pre-testing and post-testing is a commonly used method in Physics Education Research to assess student learning gains. It is well recognized in the community that timings and incentives in delivering conceptual tests can impact test results. However, it is difficult to control these variables across...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 010112
] Published Mon Jun 9, 2008
Read article
SHORT PAPERS
Eric Brewe, Laird Kramer, and George O’Brien
Among the most surprising findings in Physics Education Research is the lack of positive results on attitudinal measures, such as Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) and Maryland Physics Expectations Survey (MPEX). The uniformity with which physics teaching manages to negatively...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 013102
] Published Fri Jun 19, 2009
Read article
Eleanor C. Sayre and Andrew F. Heckler
A common format for assessment of learning is pretesting and post-testing. In this study, we collect student test data several times per week throughout a course, allowing for the measurement of the changes in student knowledge with a time resolution on the order of a few days. To avoid the possibil...
[Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 5, 013101
] Published Thu Feb 12, 2009
Read article
Papers recently accepted for publication in Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research (view more).
"Force," ontology, and language
David T. Brookes and Eugenia Etkina
We introduce a linguistic framework through which one can interpret systematically students' understanding of and reasoning about force and motion. Some researchers have suggested that students have robust misconceptions or alternative frameworks grounded in everyday experience. Others have pointed out the inconsistency of students' responses and presented a phenomenological explanation for what is observed, namely knowledge in pieces. We wish to present a view that builds on and unifies aspects of this prior research. Our argument is that many students' difficulties with force and motion are primarily due to a combination of linguistic and ontological difficulties. It is possible that students are primarily engaged in trying to define and categorize the meaning of the term "force" as spoken about by physicists. We found that this process of negotiation of meaning is remarkably similar to that engaged in by physicists in history. In this paper we will describe a study of the historical record that reveals an analogous process of meaning negotiation, spanning multiple centuries. Using methods from cognitive linguistics and systemic functional grammar, we will present a new analysis of the force and motion literature, focusing on prior studies with interview data. We will then discuss the implications of our findings for physics instruction.
Accepted Wed May 27, 2009
All Accepted Papers